The Linden Hills Model for Neighborhood Participation

Aside from a few highly restrictive neighborhood organizations, becoming a candidate for leadership in most Minneapolis neighborhoods couldn’t be easier (as my own biggest fan, I recently had the pleasure of nominating myself). Voting, however, is unnecessarily burdensome.

Council Member Lisa Bender addresses the annual meeting of the Lowry Hill East Neighborhood Association.

This is what a neighborhood annual meeting/election looks like.

In Lowry Hill East, which has a fairly typical process, the election happens around 8 p.m. Nominations are followed by speeches. Then ballots are filled and submitted over the next few minutes. If you can’t be present during those few minutes on that particular day, for whatever reason, you don’t get to vote. And don’t forget your ID, because you’ll be asked for it.

This is a recipe for low turnout. This kind of process creates barriers for people with limited time or hectic schedules: parents with young children; those who work outside a traditional nine-to-five window; or people who, after a long winter, are desperate to spend a pleasant evening at a baseball game (this last one cost me a whole lotta votes).

Numbers showing comparatively few people participate in neighborhood associations compared to other famously low turnout midterm and off-year elections.

Comparatively speaking, I suspect LHENA’s numbers are actually pretty good. For a fuller discussion, read this.

Rather than develop my own solution for this problem, I found a template: the Linden Hills Neighborhood Council (LHiNC) bylaws (see section 5). Their absentee voting process provides for much more voting (much, much more). To allow for this, candidates are nominated at least seven days before the annual meeting. Making things more convenient, nominations can be submitted by email and ballots can be printed at home.

LHiNC gives residents five days of absentee voting. That’s 120 hours of voting in Linden Hills, compared to mere minutes of voting in my (again, very typical) neighborhood association. They have also dispensed with a voter-ID requirement, opting instead to require voters to put their name and address on their ballot.

Snippet of Linden Hills Neighborhood Council bylaws.

120 hours of voting and no voter-ID requirement for Linden Hills residents.

High-renter and/or high-minority neighborhoods are the most likely to have very restrictive electoral procedures. This is one of the things I found when I looked at the bylaws of 70 Minneapolis neighborhood associations. And in the case of Linden Hills, we have a neighborhood with a large majority of white (85%) homeowners (67%) making voting as easy as possible for their residents. This is not a coincidence.

Getting people to participate in their neighborhood association is hard enough, even when targeting those already highly engaged and interested in local issues. I recently spent quite a bit of time trying to convince friends, friends of friends, and friends with babies, to give up hours of their lives to put me on the Board of an organization they barely knew existed. It’s a lot to ask. I feel guilty/grateful for their help.

There’s no good reason your neighborhood association’s electoral process should be exponentially harder than voting for Mayor or President. At a time when Minneapolis’ unrepresentative neighborhood groups are making headlines, we should be eager to remove unnecessary barriers.


Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

5 Responses to The Linden Hills Model for Neighborhood Participation

  1. Bill Lindeke
    Bill Lindeke May 7, 2015 at 6:29 pm #

    Wow, I didn’t expect to find complementary things on this post! I think this statement here — “high-renter and/or high-minority neighborhoods are the most likely to have very restrictive electoral procedures” — is hugely problematic! So Minneapolis is great at electing people who talk a lot about ending racial inequality, but when it comes to actual structural discrimination in our local community governments, we have nothing but crickets.

    I was talking with someone from the Seward neighborhood group the other day… they don’t even have a residency requirement for voting membership in their organization! Anyone who walks through Seward can vote.

    Neighborhoods in high minority and high renter areas with restrictive voting procedures (you know who you are) should be ashamed of themselves. There’s no other way to say it…

    • Wayne May 8, 2015 at 8:36 am #

      Neighborhood groups that seek to exclude renters and/or minorities from their process need to be disbanded by the city. Also it’s hilarious that these groups would think they somehow represent the residents when less than 3% of them even vote in their elections. They either need to be as toothless as that turnout would imply they should be or be forced to comply with some set of standardized rules designed to be more inclusive.

    • Sam Newberg
      Sam Newberg May 8, 2015 at 10:20 am #

      Bill, if anyone who walks through Seward can vote, then anyone who drives through Seward can, too!

  2. David Markle
    David Markle May 8, 2015 at 11:21 am #

    Here’s a recent missive of mine on this subject, in the Minnesota Daily of 4/29/15 (Contains one typo–my own–should read “WBCC” instead of “WBBA;” we live in acronym hell, don’t we).

    https://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.mndaily.com/opinion/letters-editor/2015/04/29/response-%25E2%2580%2598cunning-undemocratic-neighborhood-process-continues-near&sa=U&ei=UeFMVef5FcSpgwSX8YCwDQ&ved=0CAYQFjAB&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNFem5S65ymjg7Gs3KiwReJ3dVvh3w

    • John Edwards
      John Edwards May 11, 2015 at 11:22 pm #

      Thanks for sharing that.