Ever since Mayor Chris Coleman introduced his 2015 budget in August, I’ve been anxious to learn more about the details of the Mayor’s proposal for a new $42.5 million “8-80 Vitality Fund”. Last week a list of projects were posted online in preparation for the City Council’s October 8th budget review session. I shared the list with streets.mn readers in my post, Saint Paul’s 8-80 Vitality Fund Can Help Saint Paul Work for Everyone (October 7, 2014). But I still had a lot of questions about the details, so I headed down to City Hall to listen in on the Council discussion. The majority of the time was spent reviewing the Palace Theater renovation project and the newly prepared list of projects to be funded with the remaining $9.5M
Jonathan Sage-Martinson, Director of Planning and Economic Development, introduced the 8-80 proposal by outlining the purpose of the fund, “to promote economic development by increasing activity and vitality on our streets and public spaces throughout the City of Saint Paul.”
Next up was Joe Spencer, Director of Arts and Culture, who presented plans for renovation of the Palace Theater in downtown St Paul, using $8M of the 8-80 Vitality Fund. He acknowledged that he’s passionate about this project and has been working to bring it to fruition for many years. He sees it as a game-changer for downtown Saint Paul, which does not currently have much activity of interest to young professionals in their twenties and thirties.
The current plan is for the City to own the theater and lease it to a private company to program and manage the operations. City staff has been negotiating with an experienced team of venue operators made up of Jam Productions, which owns and operates several historic theaters in Chicago and in the Twin Cities, including the Turf Club in St Paul, and First Avenue, which puts on far more shows each year in the Twin Cities than any other promoter. According to Joe Spencer, the City should be able to recover from $4 million to all $8 million of its investment over a 20 year period.
Council members generally agreed that a newly renovated Palace Theater, with programming designed to attract millennials, would enliven the downtown after dark and help secure Saint Paul’s growing reputation as a great place for millennials to call home. However, they questioned whether the project was a good fit for the 8-80 Vitality Fund which is designed to focus on creating safe, pleasant, lively streets and public spaces that work for everyone from eight to eighty. They suggested instead that this project is a perfect fit for a Cultural Star grant, and recommended that the planners look into that option.
Having spent almost an hour discussing the Palace Theater, the Council moved quickly through the other proposed projects. The $8M slated for the Downtown Bike Loop engendered the most discussion, as Jonathan Sage-Martinson discussed the rationale for building just one of four legs of the loop. Jackson Street was chosen as the first off-street bikeway to be built, he explained, because most everyone agrees it is the best north-south route to the east of downtown. However, knowing that it will be important to have a complete loop for people to ride downtown, $450,000 of 8-80 funds will be designated to paint temporary off-street bike lanes on three additional streets. This funding will come from the $9.5M funds set aside for a variety of 8-80 streets and public spaces, but not previously assigned to particular projects.
Other projects to be included in the $9.5M ‘8-80 Streets and Public Spaces’ funding include:
- $2.5M for reconstruction of St Clair Avenue from Albert to 7th
- $1M for realignment and parking improvements on Bedford Avenue
- $525,000 toward additional ½ mile of planted medians on North Snelling
- $1.5M for addition of a turn lane on Randolph Avenue at Lexington
- $400,000 for bike lane striping (locations to be determined from Bike Plan
8-80 Public Spaces
- $225, 000 for Payne/East 7th Realignment/Bruce Vento Nature Sanctuary Trailhead (reconstruction)
- $1.5M for 3 Ring Gardens Park (acquisition)
- $300,000 for Little Mekong Plaza (demolition, design, partial development)
- $1M for Central Station Plaza (design and development)
- $100,000 for River Balcony Phase I (design)
One final important question was raised by Council member Dai Thao at the end of the session, but was not answered: “If a Cultural Star grant is used to fund the Palace Theater renovation, would that mean there is an additional $8M available in the 8-80 Vitality Fund for other projects?”
As I left City Hall, I began thinking of the many ways that an extra $8 million could help move Saint Paul toward a more livable 8-80 city. Could the bold statement put forward by the Mayor with his $42.5M 8-80 Vitality Fund turn out to be even more powerful? Or would the 8-80 fund be reduced by $8M, to $34.5M instead?
In an attempt to find an answer to that question, I e-mailed Jonathan Sage-Martinson to ask him. He, in turn, passed my question on to his colleague Tonya Tennessen, who responded: “In terms of what Council has in mind for the total fund amount, you’ll want to inquire with them directly as this is their proposal.” I intend to do just that…and encourage others to do the same.
Good topic for discussion at tomorrow’s SPBC meeting.
Also, that’s a lot of car infra improvements under that 8-80 list. However, I did see some green paint on Jefferson at Ayd Mill this morning so that was nice.
Got to agree with Mike’s comment here. I’m not sure that Peñalosa would approve of his ideas (and brand) being used to justify turn lanes for Trader Joe’s, or for parking improvements for Morelli’s Liquor store.*
(*as great as Morelli’s might be…)
He would not approve. Hopefully my video featuring him will be forthcoming before too long. (It’s really not my fault; huge foundations do lots of stuff and put me on the back burner.)
•$1M for Central Station Plaza (design and development)
I presume that is the small lot on the SE corner of 5th and Cedar right where the Bremer building was right? There were some nice renders of a plaza there during planning of the Green Line. I look forward to seeing that completed.
Interesting, nice piece. Seems like normal bike restriping and for sure the parking/general road construction are not what this fund should be used for. Perhaps a little more creative thinking can be used? more cycle tracks, not just striped lanes; pocket parks and street plazas; curb extensions and traffic calming, etc, etc….