Map Monday: Twin Cities’ Concentrated Areas of Poverty

Here’s an important map from the Met Council, of “concentrated areas of poverty” and “racially concentrated areas of poverty.” You can see where these key spots are located throughout the metro, and why it might be important to focus transit/education/and other investments in these specific areas…


For example, see the recent (minor) changes made by the Transit Advisory Board to the funding formula, which calls for paying more attention to these areas.

Anyway, the key point here is that poverty is not evenly distributed throughout the Twin Cities. Just the opposite, in fact. is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

9 Responses to Map Monday: Twin Cities’ Concentrated Areas of Poverty

  1. Eric Anondson
    Eric Anondson October 6, 2014 at 11:46 am #

    Census tracts just seem like a poor way to measure concentrations of poverty in the suburbs. Those are some pretty big tracts compared to the core.

    • Bill Lindeke
      Bill Lindeke October 6, 2014 at 12:20 pm #

      accdg to population?

    • brad October 6, 2014 at 3:50 pm #

      Eric, is there different data you’d suggest? Generally, the Census tries to keep tracts in a certain population range, so the less densely populated the area, the larger the census tract.

      • Eric Anondson
        Eric Anondson October 6, 2014 at 7:37 pm #

        Generally, I suppose they try for that but in the Map Monday last week, if you explore the NYTimes interactive page you can see there are some census tracts (Otsego, Rogers, St. Michael, NE Brooklyn Park) with 12,000–14,000 residents while some in the core are in the ranges of 2,000–4,000. Which kind of gets back to a question I asked on that thread last week, when do these tracts get redrawn? Ever? Who decides?

        (I guess I’m also personally peeved about the borders of the Hopkins tracts where the Blake Road N area is included with Oak Ridge, Farmdale, and St. Alban’s, it really neutralizes demographic trends along Blake Road.)

        I don’t know what would be better, something I’d rather see would be more of a heat map based around point data rather than area… Not sure how the census would accomplish that with its data gathering though

        • Matt Brillhart October 7, 2014 at 8:25 am #

          Could ACS data be drilled down to Census block group (one order smaller than Census tract) for those larger suburban tracts? It probably isn’t necessary for the smaller urban ones. If the data is available (and accurate) at that level, then they should definitely be using block groups instead of tracts.

  2. Walker Angell
    walker October 6, 2014 at 7:22 pm #

    It’d be interesting to see how this changes over time. I believe that Roseville and Maplewood have both seen significant increases in the number of people in or near poverty. Likewise, many parts of St Paul that were heavily populated by less wealthy seem to now be a bit wealthier folk and given predictions I’d expect this trend will continue.

    How viable an option is bicycling for folks in these neighborhoods?

    • Bill Lindeke
      Bill Lindeke October 7, 2014 at 6:36 am #

      these trends are interesting but often over-stated IMO. regional disparities remain massive.


  1. Three Things You Should Know about the Suburban Equity Cry | - October 10, 2014

    […] according to race and income. Yesterday, I posted a map on of the Twin Cities’ “(racially) concentrated areas of poverty.” The vast majority of these areas are located in the core cities of Saint Paul and […]

  2. Sunday Summary – October 12, 2014 | - October 12, 2014

    […] the “collar counties” complaint about Metro Transit’s 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. Map Monday: Twin Cities’ Concentrated Areas of Poverty shows the concentrations are distributed. Getting personal, Recognition of Privilege on the […]

Note on Comments welcomes opinions from many perspectives. Please refrain from attacking or disparaging others in your comments. sees debate as a learning opportunity. Please share your perspective in a respectful manner. View our full comment policy to learn more.

Thanks for commenting on!