Ford Parkway Reconstruction – Close but Not Quite

IMG_7277

A protected bike lane in Montreal.

Here is my open letter to Ramsey County Public Works. I know I’m late to this process and honestly don’t expect them to change their plans (which can be seen here [large PDF]). I will preface this by thanking Ramsey County for putting in any bike lanes, but if no one demands better then we can’t expect better.

My wife and I recently moved to Saint Paul’s Mac-Groveland neighborhood. We both use our bikes on a daily basis to run errands, shop, visit restaurants/bars, and commute. We chose Mac-Groveland (and the proximity to Highland Park) because we were looking to settle down in a walkable & bikeable community. My wife commutes from our home near Jefferson and Snelling to the 46th Street Blue Line station via bike which requires her to ride on Ford Parkway to cross the river.
I was very excited to hear that Ramsey County would be rebuilding a portion of Ford Parkway and including bike lanes in the design. However, when I attended the open house on October 21st at Hillcrest Recreation Center, I was very disappointed to learn the placement of the bike lanes in relation to parking and the travel lane. In 2014-15, we as a region should be past the stage of just adding door-zone bike lanes and patting ourselves on the back. This stretch of Ford Parkway also offers something that very few road segments in Saint Paul offer, no curb cuts for driveways. We have the unique opportunity to provide block long uninterrupted parking protected bikeways. This is the kind of bike infrastructure that induces cycling and provides a safe calm environment for the ~60% of the population who is enthusiastic to ride but still isn’t sure about safety. I’ve attached an image below showing what I mean (excuse the poor Photoshop skills).
FordPkwy

You get the idea.

This type of infrastructure has been shown the world over to create a safe and inviting place to cycle. The lack of curb cuts means that the only conflict points would be at intersections. This can be made safer by daylighting each intersection by removing two or three parking space and allowing drivers to easily see into the bike lane and assess potential conflict.
On this same note, the A-Line will have far side stops. Currently there doesn’t appear to be anything in the plan sheets for bus v bike conflicts, as the bus will be crossing over, and stopping in, the bike lane. The parking lane is 7′ and the bike lane is 6′, but Metro Transit plans 12′ wide bus pads which is pretty much the entirety of the parking and bike lanes.
With a parking protected bike lane, the bus stop could be an island in the parking lane (again, very common the world over) and the bus stopping in the traffic lane creates a traffic calming effect, essentially adding a brief 15-20 second stop sign which calms traffic.
If we’d like to see our city reach a cycling mode share of more than 3%, we need to take innovative steps (they are only innovative in here in the US, see the photo of a Montreal family cycling in a protected bike lane). Actually, Saint Paul has a goal of 5% cycling mode share by 2015. Let’s mature past door-zone bike lanes and really take a step into the 21st century.
dexter-bus-stop

A bike lane behind the bus stop.

Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

, , ,

4 Responses to Ford Parkway Reconstruction – Close but Not Quite

  1. Walker Angell
    Walker Angell October 29, 2014 at 3:00 pm #

    Mike, great post, I too was very disappointed in the plan for door zone bike lanes (or really just any kind of painted instead of protected bike lane). I don’t think it’s too late to change though. Pressure on the traffic engineering folk, planners, and politicians may yet get something that is safer for bicycle riders rather than more dangerous and perhaps more dangerous than doing nothing (DZBL’s are really infrastructure for vehicular cyclists and many or most I’ve talked to feel safer in the traffic lane than in the DZBL).

  2. RJ Sharpe November 2, 2014 at 7:14 pm #

    Nice post, Mike. Your ideas are solid and have proven effective in bike friendly communities around the world. Good luck with Ramsey County. I hope you’re able to bring positive change on Ford Parkway.

    • Mike Sonn
      Mike Sonn November 3, 2014 at 9:21 am #

      Thank you, RJ. The county responded as I thought they would, but hopefully this sort of infra will be on their radar for future projects.

      The only real issue here is the A-Line BRT, otherwise it is just paint and could be changed at a later date. However, BRT will be adding significant improvements to their stops so asking them to move out into a parking lane stop won’t be feasible. So we’ll be stuck with transit vs bike conflicts when those two modes should be working together not against each other.

      I was late to the game on this one. Next time I won’t be.

  3. Mike Sonn
    Mike Sonn November 3, 2014 at 12:41 pm #

    Here are some Streetsfilm videos that apply. Worth a watch.

    http://www.streetfilms.org/these-four-streetfilms-may-help-sway-your-city-into-accepting-protected-bike-lanes/

Note on Comments

streets.mn welcomes opinions from many perspectives. Please refrain from attacking or disparaging others in your comments. streets.mn sees debate as a learning opportunity. Please share your perspective in a respectful manner. View our full comment policy to learn more.

Thanks for commenting on streets.mn!