Calls for Accountability Miss the Mark

I’m going to describe a government agency and let you, brilliant reader, guess who it is.

  • This government agency is an un-elected bureaucracy with its top-ranking official appointed by the governor, who is then confirmed by the Minnesota Senate.
  • This agency gets involved with planning activities and expenditures at both the regional and local level.
  • This agency has an annual budget for the Twin Cities metropolitan area in the hundreds of millions.
  • This agency has built transportation projects where annual users fall short of projections.
  • This agency charges its users for its services but those revenues fall short of expenses, often requiring transfers from local and state budgets to make up the difference

Can you guess which agency I’m talking about?

rickroll

If you guessed MnDOT, you’re right! You may have thought I was talking about those baddies at the Metropolitan Council given the recent House subcommittee created to hold them accountable.

Truth is, the two organizations share many similarities. The Met Council’s entire 2015 budget is  $936 million, compared to 2014 MnDOT spending in the Metro District on just trunk highways (no county highway or municipal street contributions included) totaling $685 million. The Metropolitan Council members and chair are appointed by the current governor and confirmed by the Senate, just like MnDOT’s commissioner. Both organizations impact land use and transportation planning by the investments they make. Both have projects with questionable capital costs per rider/driver.

I know this was a fairly trollish post. But we’re seeing the continuation of the campaign mantra from one political party carry over into action in the legislature. And while some of it may sound a bit over the top (like completely banning streetcars), sometimes things do slip through (like the Dan Patch gag order) that may not actually make sense.

If we want to hold the Metropolitan Council more accountable (and maybe I’d be on board with that, given all the expensive wastewater infrastructure and highly subsidized suburban bus routes and park & rides in our region), we should at least cast our gaze on other departments of government. Even if they build things your political party happens to like.

Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

, , ,

4 Responses to Calls for Accountability Miss the Mark

  1. UrbanDoofus January 29, 2015 at 10:15 am #

    I like your posts. If you ran for office, I would vote for you.

    • Wayne January 29, 2015 at 3:18 pm #

      Me too. I’d run for office myself, but I’m too unlikable.

  2. Matt Steele January 29, 2015 at 10:37 am #

    #dotrolled

  3. Wayne January 29, 2015 at 3:19 pm #

    Say what you will about MNDOT, but at least they probably actually drive on the roads they build to get to work.

    #metcounciltrolled ):

Note on Comments

streets.mn welcomes opinions from many perspectives. Please refrain from attacking or disparaging others in your comments. streets.mn sees debate as a learning opportunity. Please share your perspective in a respectful manner. View our full comment policy to learn more.

Thanks for commenting on streets.mn!