Upper Harbor Terminal Amphitheater and a North Minneapolis Riverfront

Looking at the surface, an amphitheater at the Upper Harbor Terminal (UHT) would be fantastic. Selfishly, it’s just over 2 miles from me and the thought of seeing an outdoor concert at 10,000 capacity, and within walking distance is almost a dream. Awesome-O! I was intrigued enough to take a walk on the grid to hopefully learn more.

This North Minneapolis riverfront plan (opens Aug. 18 PDF) would certainly have its pros and cons along with questions. Is it easy to walk/bike there? How much of a burden will vehicle traffic be during event exiting? How will it affect housing and community? How much does the community know? Who’s paying for it? Who’s in charge? It’s a pretty mammoth sized project proposed at 48 acres, including 15+ acres of green public park areas.

To sum up a history, this plan came in with the St. Anthony Lock and Dam closure downstream by downtown due to gross, invasive carp. The UHT barge terminal operation then closed down. The terminal is now largely used for a host of industrial businesses, plus the specialty Mississippi Mushrooms and their weekend markets.

Mississippi Mushrooms Entrance

Mississippi Mushrooms Entrance at N 1st St and Port of Mpls Dr

Couple these with the wants of the city, Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB), and proposed features from Master Developer United Properties, and you have plans for the North Minneapolis Riverfront. The Community Performing Arts Center (CPAC) would be a key element and operated by First Avenue Productions. This destination site includes the amphitheater, 15+ acres of public green space, riverfront park, parkway, mixed-use buildings, retail, and possibly hotel(s).

Traffic and Transportation Nightmare?

Bike Lane N 2nd St and Lowry

Unprotected bike lane on N 2nd St just north of Lowry

So, how will exiting traffic affect nearby Minneapolis neighborhoods? Amphitheaters like Red Rocks and the Gorge in George (WA) are exiting traffic nightmares and are towards or in the middle of nowhere. No matter what, an amphitheater in the city will most likely result in traffic nightmares for both concert goers and nearby neighborhoods. They do mention a parkway to get to and from the Minneapolis Riverfront. It’s just a little, and maybe for those on bikes, it’s promising. Currently, nearby N 2nd St only has an unprotected bike lane. Looking from the Lowry Ave Bridge, I was surprised to see no bike parkway. I just figured there was always one there. I can only imagine they are going to improve or build on all of these. I would hope so, anyway.

Affordable Housing?   

They also place a presence on housing, including affordable housing. However, “including affordable housing” to me is usually just clever wording for market-rate housing. A concern could be not just the new housing, but also rentals in nearby North possibly going up. North Minneapolis is so community driven and it wouldn’t be a surprise (to me) for many residents to be generally against this new UHT destination. No one wants their rent increased by landlords using this new project as an excuse to do so. Related, here’s Beth’s story from Loring Park, just one of many concerned citizens in regard to protections for existing renters, not more neighbors.

Don’t Northeast North

Similar fears happen in parts of Northeast as well. WCCO reviews a few neighborhood people in fear that raising housing prices can price people out of their neighborhood. It happens in my neighborhood often, and maybe yours as well. People love Northeast, especially the Arts District. My guess is the folks there would be apprehensive if the same project was to be built on the east side of the river. Northsiders have their view, too.

A couple quotes from a North News piece:

Northsiders and North Minneapolis leaders have continued to stress the importance of being involved in the visioning process.

“There’s a way for them to do this development organically, without tearing this all down, so people can grow on it and we want to be part of that,” said Ian Silver-Ramp, founder of Mississippi Mushrooms.

Public Investment

Public investment is slated at $30 million, including the $15+ million in state bonding that’s already been approved. Maybe there’s some solace in knowing we could build approximately 16 or 17 of these at the cost we’re generously giving to Zygi and his palace. Also, the City of Minneapolis would own the UHT land until a master developer agreement is reached.

Note of Interest

First Avenue Productions is one of the development partners for this. I really look forward to see the vision Dayna Frank and co. has.

The conceptual part is now complete but still in different meetings stages. They’ve had meetings open to the public as well as presence in community events like Open Streets West Broadway. Future meetings or events could be your chance to voice your opinion in person. Infrastructure and construction won’t most likely happen until 2020 or 2021 so there’s time to get in your word!

This wound up being a nice walk and a few more photos on a shared Google Photos album are more than worth sharing.

Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

, , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to Upper Harbor Terminal Amphitheater and a North Minneapolis Riverfront

  1. commissar October 13, 2018 at 8:45 pm #

    would have to be some really good security in that area. it’s just the reality of north currently that there’s alot of crime in the area. transportation shouldn’t be too problematic as long as they put in some ramps and good transit (good luck with republicans).

  2. Devin Hogan
    Devin Hogan October 14, 2018 at 10:56 am #

    I really like the partners involved in this project, and the quality of their work is apparent in how they approached the amphitheater concept – it’s a great use of scale, sightlines, and urban decay.

    Egress is going to be god-awful, like the parking lot at Dodgers Stadium. The city could set up a park-and-ride situation or even water taxi, Chicago-style. Also an opportunity to advocate for a freeway lid to create more developable land and lower cost pressures across greater Camden.

    • Paul Jahn
      Paul Jahn October 14, 2018 at 10:06 pm #

      Devin, I didn’t even think of a freeway lid. Makes me wonder if this is a project MnDot has thought about exploring. I suppose I’m too far out of the circle to know. Thanks for sharing!

Leave a Reply

Note on Comments

streets.mn welcomes opinions from many perspectives. Please refrain from attacking or disparaging others in your comments. streets.mn sees debate as a learning opportunity. Please share your perspective in a respectful manner. View our full comment policy to learn more.

Thanks for commenting on streets.mn!