Lines On Our Map

Transit Map

The Twin Cities: A metropolitan region that certainly values idea of transit–in the abstract. It’s full of well-intentioned people (and politicians!) who travel to Chicago ~once a year and take the Blue Line into the city from O’Hare. And college graduates who spent a semester abroad in Hamburg and fashion themselves as folks who know the value of a train. And, even, occasionally, we’ll take the bus from the parking lot at Ridgedale to the Minnesota State Fair.

We’re a smart group, right? We set up the Metropolitan Council back in the day, we regularly trounce all the red states (except Utah sometimes–what?) in all the fashionable listicle clickbait online rankings, we know someone with two (2) Jet-skis up near Brainerd, and in 2008 we even went to a political caucus. As far as we know, it’s been working well for a while. But lately, we’re getting a bit of a feeling that things may be going awry, right? That Southwest Light Rail business has been in the StarTribune over and over again, and those guys just can’t figure it out. Some rich people in Minneapolis and some loons in St. Louis Park are whining and holding up that new train. Those NIMBYs. What’s going on with that?

There are a lot of examples, in the course of human events, of lots of really smart, really well-intentioned, and extensively credentialed people getting together and cooking up schemes that are automatically hailed as great ideas by lots of people who are just a couple levels down on the totem pole from those top people. In modern society, that’s that group of people who read the newspapers regularly and on some level want a bit of credit for knowing what CTIB stands for. An extremely generous guess would put that chunk of society at, I dunno, ten percent of adults, maybe a third of the voters who show up to midterms, depending on the precinct. Most people reading this are probably in that segment of society.

The thing is that, often, in a rush to show that we grasp the findings of whatever highly-paid consultant or Organization Whose Title Commands Respect, we completely miss the point of why we asked our question in the first place. And in some cases, we allow ourselves to end up going down really ridiculous, common sense-defying paths wherein we think that, say, housing prices will increase indefinitely (are you an economist?) or that we should tear down the entire Gateway District because it’s smelly (are you an urban planner?).

If you go to the Hennepin County Central Library in Downtown Minneapolis at the corner of Nicollet Mall & 4th Street, you can go up a couple flights of stairs and find yourself among rows of file cabinets containing hundreds of rolls of microfilm with copies of historical Minneapolis Star and Minneapolis Tribune newspapers. And after spending an hour or two flying past old Dayton’s ads looking for articles about transit, it becomes clear that team transit has been talking about transit for decades. Adam Froehlig has a great collection of old transit planning maps from the 80s, 90s, and aughts on his website. It puts calls for “study” into perspective. We’ve been studying and talking and promoting, and more recently, blogging and commenting and Tweeting and networking ourselves in circles since at least the Carter administration. In the meantime, new freeways are built in exurbia with bipartisan support and it still takes half an hour to get from Downtown to Uptown on the 6.

Lots of smart people (the people mentioned in paragraph three) will consider the meager transit improvements we’ve been able to cobble together over the past decade and call it a victory; we got something, we’re doing way better than Wisconsin. Doesn’t it feel like that’s being too realistic sometimes? Generic pro-status quo argument: We need to do all this and jump through all these hoops and make all these silly routing decisions so we can get the 50% federal matching funds for this project and get it built. Here’s a new thought: We knew, basically, that we wanted to build light rail in the Southwest Corridor in the late 1980s. We could have just built the whole thing then, by ourselves, for half of what it will eventually cost when you factor in the increased cost of materials and inflation alone. To say nothing of endless studying. We didn’t do this, freight rail ended up in the Kenilworth Corridor after Hiawatha Avenue was rebuilt, and the rest is history.

Obviously, this is idealistic. That’s the point. We need to be serious about what we want. Certain outstate legislators and homebound Internet commenters will always say no, because they’re convinced that mass transit is a plot. The answer will always be no, even if they couch it in “Well, what about buses instead?” because when it comes time to fund buses, they’ll say no to that too. The conversation needs to start with a Hennepin Avenue subway. It needs to start with a Nicollet Avenue subway. We should be building a streetcar on Franklin Avenue, not on what should be the north-south transit spine of the entire city. It all feels like Obamacare: Transportation Edition. Progressives and liberals like to compromise with themselves before they even get to the negotiating table. They like to argue with each other on E-Democracy about PRT plans before getting in their cars and driving three blocks to a coffee shop.

We deserve better than watching Scott Walker and Amy Klobuchar standing next to each other with shovels at the groundbreaking for the new Stillwater bridge. Enough Minnesotans, including some suburban Republicans, support meaningful investment in mass transit even if their legislator does a poor job of voting that way. We’re at the point where this shouldn’t be such a terrible slog all day, every day, all year. This needs to be about more than arbitrarily putting lines on a map in a couple places where there’s some room left. It’s 2014.

Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

12 Responses to Lines On Our Map

  1. No more maps! March 4, 2014 at 10:10 am #

    Lobby, lobby, lobby. Short of running for office yourself, lobbying your elected officials is where we have the most power. The Streets.mn voter’s guide and having happy hour with local candidates is helpful too, but we need to hold officials feet to the fire. Let’s get organized and let those “outstate legislators and homebound Internet commenters” that it’s our city. …Great article.

  2. Andrew Degerstrom
    Andrew Degerstrom March 4, 2014 at 10:14 am #

    The State Fair express bus doesn’t run out of Ridgedale parking lot, but the nearby CR 73 Park & Ride. Other than that, quite excellent as usual.

  3. Bill Lindeke
    Bill Lindeke March 4, 2014 at 11:54 am #

    So what you’re saying is that the Move MN plan is a great leap forward, because it would actually build stuff? Are you saying co-locate the SWLRT and get it done? Didn’t you write the column ” we have to stop the southwest corridor”? (https://streets.mn/2013/07/21/we-need-to-stop-the-southwest-corridor/)

    What is the takeaway?

    • Nick Magrino
      Nick Magrino March 5, 2014 at 5:47 pm #

      I dunno. There might not be a takeaway.

  4. Froggie March 4, 2014 at 1:45 pm #

    Thanks for the shout-out, Nick. I should probably add to that online map collection, since I do have some more material…:o)

  5. Cole March 5, 2014 at 12:37 am #

    I hope you understand and respect that it is quite a bit more complicated than this. The “suburban” support for transit that you speak of doesn’t go very far if the transit isn’t getting to their community. Urban planners have convinced mayors and council members that they don’t have to raise taxes to pay for their infrastructure, they just need a transit investment to attract the real property tax payers, big apartments and businesses. There is no vision for regional economic development. There is no vision for transportation that addresses what we should be doing, as opposed to what we need to get things approved. This is the reality of politics. To overcome politics, you need strong leadership and a strong common purpose. Transit doesn’t have a clear purpose in this region. Many of those in power think it is about “catalyzing development,” which is basically a big neon sign that says GET THIS SO YOU CAN GET DEVELOPMENT. It’s winners and losers. Government fragmentation. Unequal power structures. Congestion popping up where it didn’t used to. Affordable housing. Vested interests in growth. The list goes on.

    Point is, the lines on the map are not arbitrary. The politics of this discussion is not arbitrary. And transit is not universally accepted. It is a house of cards, in many ways. Time to start influencing the process in meaningful ways, instead of just posting blogs that are opinion pieces on why the world isn’t the way you want it to be. Unless you want to just be another blog. I appreciate the interest in the topic, but where is the meaningful path forward? Where is the call to arms for who is going to change all this? How can anyone reading this blog actually make a difference? You are a blog. Call some people out. Get people contacting the people that matter.

    • Nick Magrino
      Nick Magrino March 5, 2014 at 7:22 am #

      I don’t really disagree with you. This is just a blog. People blogging in circles about things they already agree on isn’t getting much done right? I’m 23 and, for the past eight months or so, have thrown together 750ish words every six weeks about it sucking to ride the bus. I’m not that interesting.

      On the other hand, if I were some organization that has been taking tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in grant money every year for the past couple decades to do this work and at the end of the day I’m able to point to Northstar, the Red Line, and Union Depot as successes…well that would be disappointing, right?

      • Cole March 13, 2014 at 3:38 pm #

        It is disappointing that politics trump most things. Very House if Cards (the TV show), as in support for transit (allegorically). That being said, my point is that the only people that can change politics are constituents and the polticians themselves. As a staff of a so-called agency, I can only advise and rarely is my personal opinion considered.

        So, have any of you sent you thoughts to Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Met Council members? Have you ever asked CTIB where their public process is? Do they have one? Why aren’t the cities doing land use planning more involved in decison making? What is the goal of building transit? Why are buses being ignored while they have over $100 million dollars in the bank?

        I’m reluctant to ask in my position, but they are thought-provoking questions. Post you question. Post the responses. Hold people more accountable. Better than just complaining, in my opinion.

    • Bill Lindeke
      Bill Lindeke March 5, 2014 at 9:14 am #

      This is just a blog. It is sad and true. We encourage people to get involved, but streets.mn doesn’t have a “position” per se, not even about transit. It we did, I fear the conversation would be a lot less interesting. Believe it nor not, this website isn’t about pushing an agenda, but about fostering debate and exchange.

      Of course, anyone here is welcome to post comments encouraging outreach and activism. For example, the Move MN proposal seems an obvious fit for Nick’s call to arms about transit, what with the proposed metro-area sales tax for transit: http://www.movemn.org/

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Move MN is a Good Compromise | streets.mn - March 6, 2014

    […] I haven’t shed my previous qualms about the bill. It’d be nice if the metro area could have taxing autonomy without having to compromise with unrelated road interests. (And I completely agree with Chuck that we need more regional and municipal control over our transportation decisions.) It’d be nice if MN-DOT stood by a “fix it first” policy instead of building new exurban freeways to nowhere. It’d be nice if our transit planners put light rail stops where the people are, and invested only in places that commit to density and walkability. It’d be nice if the lower-case ‘e’s on the Move MN website were shaped differently… […]

Note on Comments

streets.mn welcomes opinions from many perspectives. Please refrain from attacking or disparaging others in your comments. streets.mn sees debate as a learning opportunity. Please share your perspective in a respectful manner. View our full comment policy to learn more.

Thanks for commenting on streets.mn!