What’s In a Brick?

Many progressive U.S. cities, Minneapolis included, spend a bit extra to spruce up intersections, medians or sidewalks through detailed brick treatments. I am talking about ADA crosswalks that are brick-laid as opposed to a pre-formed single plastic piece. Cycling intersections that have different concrete treatments to signal an intersection. Medians or shoulders with brick landscaping (assuming they are too narrow to grow anything meaningful). Where many communities resort to paint or nothing at all in such situations, Minneapolis and other communities dress things up.

However lavish these treatments might be, however, these places have nothing relative to the world’s most bicycle and pedestrian friendly communities. The best places use an endless array of brick treatments to signal even the most mundane of street elements. Different colored bricks delineate parking spaces. Slightly angled bricks signal intersections. Altered bricks mark rights-of-ways for modes. Using all three techniques define important crossing areas or thoroughfares.

Paint on asphalt has its advantages (e.g., it is cheap and can be easily erased). Brick streets (rather than asphalt or concrete) are harder on the wheeled fleet that uses it. They are more costly to build and maintain (Last year, I cycled every day on the brutal–but beautiful–stoned streets of Bologna which, owing to the economic crisis, were being “patched” using blacktop in a blasphemous kind of way). Don’t get the snowplow operators started talking about brick treatments.

But signaling bicycle and pedestrian treatments with brick adds both permanence and class. Notwithstanding its drawbacks, more creative use of brick plays an underestimated role in fostering a sense of place. I take to the streets of the Nijmegen, the Netherlands, to show the variety of uses of bricks and how a simple block of concrete (or clay bearing soil) vibrantly contributes to the city’s appeal.

IMG_0520

IMG_0522 IMG_0525 IMG_0526 IMG_0536 IMG_0535 IMG_0530 IMG_0529 IMG_0537 IMG_0539 IMG_0540 IMG_0542 IMG_0553 IMG_0552 IMG_0551 IMG_0549

Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

, , ,

18 Responses to What’s In a Brick?

  1. travelgal January 16, 2015 at 8:53 am #

    While I love the look of brick, they simply don’t hold up in Minnesota’s winters. (Have you forgotten?!) The brick treatments on Lexington fell apart, became HUGE dangerous potholes, and were replaced once with brick before being paved over. How about concrete that is etched and colored to look like brick? I know, it’s not as pretty, but it won’t become a hazard after a few seasons — and the cost savings might be enough to get cities to actually use it everywhere instead of just in a few key spots.

    • Walker Angell
      Walker Angell January 16, 2015 at 9:11 am #

      Travelgal, bricks can hold up well even here if installed properly. You need only see the very extensive use of brick throughout The Netherlands, Finland, and Sweden to see how well they can do in environments harsher than ours.

      When installed properly they hold up quite well, though in our cold environment do to some extent require more maintenance. I say to some extent because brick requires maintenance while such needed maintenance with asphalt can more easily be ignored. However, brick results in consistently better street surfaces than asphalt. Where our asphalt surfaces deteriorate and become extremely poor to drive on and in many cases nearly impossible to ride a bicycle on, well maintained brick provides a consistently relatively smooth surface every year for centuries. To provide such a smooth surface with asphalt would cost over 5 times as much as it does with brick.

      Also, brick does not require painting. The markings never wear off. Drivers can’t say that they didn’t see the line or sharks teeth because they were worn down. These delineation’s, even 10 years old, also seem easier to see in winter than painted lines only a year old.

      That said, a good asphalt bikeway is much better to ride on than a one of brick. Brick vs patched asphalt? Give me the brick.

      BTW, for the construction geeky folks do a search on tiger paver.

      • Adam Froehlig
        Adam Froehlig January 16, 2015 at 9:44 am #

        As a meteorologist, I would disagree that the Netherlands (especially) and much of Scandinavia have a “harsher environment”. They just don’t see the wild temperature swings that the Upper Midwest sees.

        • Walker Angell
          Walker Angell January 16, 2015 at 11:10 am #

          Agree on Netherlands. Finland and much of Sweden can certainly compete with us on cold and snow build up but they they also may not get as hot and humid in the summer nor have the back and forth freeze/thaw swings we do which may help them considerably with brick.

        • Walker Angell
          Walker Angell January 16, 2015 at 11:15 am #

          Brick breaths better than most asphalt and if installed properly moves easier without cracking and potholes. If the underlayment is done well this should allow moisture that causes cracking and potholes to percolate through (and be better for the environment instead of going down storm sewers and then being shunted off to the Mississippi instead of resupplying our aquifers). There’s a spot a friend showed me in The Netherlands where the brick buckles up in a mound every winter and then settles back to perfectly level by the end of January. Fascinating.

          Both of these should favor brick in our climate.

    • Brick Tamland January 20, 2015 at 4:46 pm #

      Bricks can also be a problem for seniors using walkers, even when they’re new.

  2. Aaron Isaacs
    Aaron Isaacs January 16, 2015 at 9:17 am #

    Despite claims to the contrary, brick simply doesn’t stand up to Minnesota’s winter frost heaves. It’s a maintenance headache, a rough ride and slippery when wet. The money is better spent elsewhere.

    • Alex January 16, 2015 at 10:46 am #

      My understanding is that Minnesota is too cold for freeze-thaw cycles to be particularly bad for paving materials. I hear that they are far worse in places like the Appalachian Mountains, which are also more wet than Minnesota. Yet cities like Asheville and Charlottesville are covered in brick. Can you support your claim with any academic citation? I suspect the lack of brick in the Twin Cities has more to do with the geology than the climate.

      • Bill Lindeke
        Bill Lindeke January 16, 2015 at 2:32 pm #

        That’s going to be changing. Expect more temps bouncing back and forth on each side of 32º.

  3. Matty Lang
    Matty Lang January 16, 2015 at 11:04 am #

    Personally, I thought Kevin was referring to the Progressive genre of rock music that was especially popular in the 1980s and characterized by the heavy use of keyboard instruments and lengthy compositions.

  4. Matty Lang
    Matty Lang January 16, 2015 at 11:09 am #

    I just love the “can do” spirit that always gets displayed regarding Minnesota’s exceptional winter weather conditions. Our weather is certainly strong, good looking, and above average. I must be having a snarky day.

    • Wayne January 16, 2015 at 2:11 pm #

      Seems more ‘can’t do’ whenever it comes to something more difficult/expensive/nicer like bricks or tunneling under streets. Or did I miss the snark?

      • Matty Lang
        Matty Lang January 17, 2015 at 9:40 am #

        Yeah, it was a sarcastic can do. It’s definitely a can’t do attitude and I really don’t get it. Has Ronald Regan been gone for so long that we’ve lost our sense of exceptionalism and now our winter weather is the only thing that is exceptional? Let’s lift up our heads and accomplish engineering feats that laugh in the face of winter.

        • Wayne January 19, 2015 at 3:11 pm #

          Here here! For a region that’s doing so well economically, the cities are really lacking in boldness and vision for the future.

  5. Joe D January 16, 2015 at 2:21 pm #

    Another draw back of brick is you can’t roller-skate on it.. I’m probably more in the minority than bikers on that comment.

  6. Monica Millsap Rasmussen
    Monica Rasmussen January 18, 2015 at 2:06 am #

    How do other women feel about walking on brick? For me, especially in more feminine shoes, I inevitably end up slightly twisting an ankle on brick every time. Maybe I just want to walk too fast.

  7. Brick Tamland January 20, 2015 at 4:43 pm #

    It’s progressive with a small p, like “dress conservatively” or “apply liberally”. Pedestrian improvements show that a city is making progress toward walkability, calmer traffic, etc.

  8. Reuben Collins
    Reuben Collins January 21, 2015 at 9:49 am #

    I was in Copenhagen recently and watched a crew placing a new sidewalk. All of their sidewalks in the downtown core are paved in these little 4″x4″x4″ granite pavers or something similar. You don’t really find formed in place concrete like we use extensively here. But, I watched this crew pour a bed of about 4″-6″ concrete, then add a layer of 2″ or so of sand, then place the pavers on top. Bottom line is that the pavers in this particular instance were entirely an aesthetic treatment. The poured (but invisible when finished) concrete base provided the structure.

Note on Comments

streets.mn welcomes opinions from many perspectives. Please refrain from attacking or disparaging others in your comments. streets.mn sees debate as a learning opportunity. Please share your perspective in a respectful manner. View our full comment policy to learn more.

Thanks for commenting on streets.mn!