Connecting Saint Paul’s Riverfront via Union Depot

Over at MinnPost, Peter Callaghan writes of the proposed River Balcony in Downtown St. Paul. This is a planning effort to connect Downtown St. Paul to its riverfront alongside large-scale redevelopment from the old West Publishing and County Jail sites to the west to the old Downtown Post Office being redeveloped as the Custom House to the east.

This planning effort should also push to build an extension of the Union Depot concourse to the riverfront to serve future river transportation and build a public connection between the riverfront and Lowertown.

River Walk

River Balcony concept. City of St. Paul via MinnPost

While the idea of a front porch for Downtown St. Paul overlooking the river should be attainable, the connection to the riverfront itself is daunting – especially because of Shepard Road and the freight railroads that occupy the riverfront below the bluff. Other than a sidewalk sandwiched between Shepard Road and the river’s northern levee, there’s not a compelling reason for people to be along the waterfront between Ontario Street and Sibley Street, just down the bluff from the heart of downtown.

Yet there’s still appeal to connecting people to the water itself. Herbert Tousley IV, chief development manager for Exeter Group, is quoted by Callaghan saying, “There is a disconnect between downtown and the river. From the standpoint of people living and working downtown, it’s a huge amenity to make that connection.”

More action on the riverfront

img_7031

Custom House (left), Union Depot Concourse (background), Mississippi Queen at Lambert’s Landing (foreground). Flickr / CC / Mike Hicks

There’s even more of a reason to connect Downtown to the Riverfront if St. Paul can regain its historical role as the northern gateway for passenger travel along the Mississippi. In 2017, European cruise giant Viking River Cruises will launch a Mississippi River cruise product with the northern terminus somewhere in the St. Paul area. While officials from Stillwater and Red Wing pitch their cities’ riverfronts to Viking, St. Paul would be the natural home for a terminus with its abundant amenities and multimodal connections to the region.

With all of these changes on the horizon for St. Paul’s downtown riverfront, it’s time we take a look at another opportunity to connect people to the water: Union Depot.

_mg_9015

The renovated Concourse. The Mississippi is just beyond those windows at the back. Flickr / CC / Mike Hicks

Extending the role of Union Depot’s concourse

Union Depot’s concourse was originally built to bring passengers across 18 passenger tracks and 9 platforms so they could get to and from waiting trains. The cavernous concourse is over 400 feet long, and extends as far today as it did when it opened in 1923. The concourse serves Amtrak, local and long distance bus service, and will someday serve additional passenger rail services.

Except for these transportation connections, the concourse is a long dead-end walk, but with great views of the riverfront as a reward at the end.

Depot aerial 2009_02

Riverfront: So close, yet so far away. Pre-renovation photo. Flickr / CC / Ramsey County

It’s less than 300 feet from the end of the existing concourse to the shore of the Mississippi River. This is a relatively trivial distance given the overall vastness of the Union Depot complex, but it’s a vital missing link. St. Paul should build an extension of the concourse across the railroad mainlines and Shepard Road to truly connect the riverfront to Lowertown and eastern Downtown St. Paul.

A new connection could serve Viking River Cruises and other river transportation providers. Passengers would have a clear and inviting welcome to Downtown, local hotels and restaurants, and frequent transit service to Downtown Minneapolis or MSP Airport. It would leverage the existing passenger amenities and infrastructure in the newly-renovated St. Paul Union Depot, potentially including waiting areas for cruise passengers as well as ticketing, luggage service, and general office space for cruise companies.

A new connection would also provide a crucial link from Downtown to the riverfront, Lower Landing Park, and the trail network that extends along the river. The link would overcome the railroad and Shepard Road as barriers between Lowertown and the River by crossing overhead, and it would overcome the barrier of the intense grade change between Kellogg Blvd and the river by providing vertical circulation.

Most importantly, it would allow us to leverage our recent $243 million investment in St. Paul Union Depot even further. It would create more of a reason for more people to pass through this beautiful facility, creating more demand for shops, restaurants, and services within the facility and in greater Lowertown.

Here’s how it could work:

Proposed riverfront connection.

Proposed riverfront connection, by author.


Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

, , , , ,

11 Responses to Connecting Saint Paul’s Riverfront via Union Depot

  1. Mike Sonn
    Mike Sonn June 26, 2015 at 11:34 am #

    Awesome!

  2. Monte Castleman
    Monte Castleman June 26, 2015 at 11:49 am #

    Is the idea of extending light rail all the way to Union Station permanently dead or is it something they hope to do someday?

    • Adam Miller
      Adam Miller June 26, 2015 at 11:55 am #

      The last stop on the Green Line is in front of the Union Depot.

    • Bill Lindeke
      Bill Lindeke June 26, 2015 at 11:55 am #

      I think there is still space reserved there in case LRT goes East somehow.

  3. Bill Lindeke
    Bill Lindeke June 26, 2015 at 11:55 am #

    I had the same thought, and remember asking the Ramsey County Rail Authority folks this very question when the Depot was being rehabbed.

    The said they never considered it.

    It seems like a real missed chance to make a cool connection. Hopefully, with the destruction/construction/rehab of buildings on Kellogg, we can correct the mistake.

    • Matt Steele
      Matt Steele June 26, 2015 at 12:32 pm #

      Sarah and I took a tour when the Depot was under renovation (AWESOME, btw). I remember hearing that the reason why they have such small windows on the river end of the concourse was because that’s how it was historically.

      They did a very thorough historic renovation, to the point at which I think we missed a chance to open up some of these spaces even more. But I remember them mentioning that the reason why the river end of the concourse had small windows and little ornamentation is because the original designers presumed the concourse would eventually expand even further towards the river. So, maybe this is, in a way, furthering the original intent of the Depot.

      And the newer elements (Kellogg entry, new platform connections for bus and Amtrak) are postmodern glass and metal structures. If we used the same design elements for this new connection, it would be very clear what is historic and what is new.

  4. Nathaniel M Hood
    Nathaniel June 26, 2015 at 12:30 pm #

    This would be great.

  5. Eric Anondson
    Eric Anondson June 26, 2015 at 12:45 pm #

    I could imagine an elevated boardwalk linking the corner of the park at Robert and Kellogg to the Union Depot extension that would link the landing.

  6. Steve Morris June 27, 2015 at 10:10 am #

    You might want to think in terms of going under the railroad tracks instead of over. Either way railroad coordination will be complicated but creating an overpass high enough to clear the railroad tracks on the elevated platform would create a pretty massive structure on the riverbank to accomodate ADA elevators and stairs.
    Going under the deck would also have issues but should be much easier to accomplish and much shorter for people. It also eases historic issues for the many organizations that have a say in modifications in the area.

    • Matt Steele June 28, 2015 at 5:01 pm #

      The concourse already goes over all but two of the railroad tracks.

      • Steve Morris July 3, 2015 at 9:48 am #

        There are three freight tracks on the train deck beyond the concourse as well as two of the Depot passenger tracks. An addition was put onto the south end of the concourse to provide adequate vertical clearance for today’s passenger requirements.

        UP and CP both have ownership of the freight tracks. The RR’s will require significant vertical clearance over their tracks. Probably 20-25 feet. Since the tracks are already about 15-20 feet above Warner Road, the riverside structure would be 40-50 feet high. It would need elevator(s), stairs, power and at least some kind of HVAC.

        Literally dozens of organization, from the Corps of Engineers and FRA, down to local neighborhood groups would have some kind of approval authority.

        I do think that improving the access under the deck is worthwhile at some point.