Here’s the ranking [in absolute, not per capita, terms]:
It looks like Minneapolis is punching a bit below its weight, though that might be accounted for by the dual downtowns. At any rate, here’s what the City Observatory explanation has to say about the map:
We also use the Storefront Index to track change over time, looking at the growth of businesses and street level activity in a rebounding neighborhood in Portland. There’s also strong evidence to suggest that concentrations of storefront businesses provide a conducive environment for walking. We’ve overlaid the storefront index clusters on a heat map of Walk Scores for selected metropolitan areas to explore the relationship between these two measures. While Walk Score includes destinations like parks and schools, as well as businesses, it also measures walkability from the standpoint of home-based origins, while our Storefront Index shows the concentration of commercial destinations.
City Observatory has developed the Storefront Index as a freely available tool for urbanists and city planners to use in their communities. The index material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (as is all City Observatory material), and shapefiles containing storefront index information is available here.
This is something that Sam Newberg has been harping on for some time in downtown Minneapolis, the number of doors and windows on the streets. I’m not sure if they count skyway businesses in this metric, but I suspect not.
At any rate, it’s safe to say that Minneapolis is not helped by its skyway system, which (in my opinion) dilutes the pedestrian traffic and economic agglomeration potential of the downtown.
Here’s the 3-mile radius map in detail. You can see that most of the storefronts are on Nicollet, Central, or Lake:
At any rate, it’s pretty cool data. Looks like Portland is not just a street in Minneapolis after all?