The Quarterly Transit Report — November 2018

Dealing with a driver shortage, and a budget deficit

Few people set out to be bus drivers. They select the job because the pay and benefits are good, even though the working hours tend to be inconvenient. So when unemployment is low, Metro Transit has difficulty recruiting enough drivers to offset retirements, let alone grow the system.

This summer 20 rush hour buses were added on under-construction I-35W to lure frustrated auto commuters. All these factors combined during the summer to put Metro Transit in a hole. For the first time in a long time, Metro Transit found itself 90 drivers short and unable to routinely fill all its work, despite extensive efforts to recruit new drivers.

The usual answer to driver shortages is to add overtime, but there’s not enough overtime available to to offset that kind of shortfall. The result was a twice-a-day scramble to cover the rush hour, and trips were lost daily with no opportunity to warn regular commuters their bus would be missing.

In August Metro Transit took the unprecedented step of temporarily suspending about 65 rush hour trips per day, so at least the customers would know what to expect.

That ends December 1st, when the new quarterly schedule change goes in. By then, Metro Transit will have reduced the driver deficit to about 20. It has increased the driver count by 30, while reducing the amount of service by about 50 drivers.

Within the service changes are two big counter-currents. First, the 60+ suspended rush hour trips were reinstated. All those trips had good ridership when they were suspended, so hopefully those riders will return.

To offset those reinstatements, something had to go, so Metro Transit finally took the axe to a series of longstanding weak performers, selectively pruned the rush hour expresses, and made a surprising cut to one of its heaviest routes.

It should also be emphasized that the cuts are required to deal with a looming budget deficit, thanks to an anti-transit legislature.

Cutting the weak performers
Route 16, the University Avenue local, was dramatically shortened and the service downgraded when the Green Line opened. It continued to provide half-hourly frequency from downtown St. Paul to 27th Avenue SE in Minneapolis. Now it has been cut back to Fairview Avenue in St. Paul. There was little ridership west of there and Route 67 covers most of the vacated portion.

Route 67 West Minnehaha (St. Paul) itself has always been weak, especially the portion in Minneapolis that passes through Prospect Park and terminates at the Blue Line Franklin Station. Prior to 2014, this was the Route 8 shuttle, probably the poorest performer in the Metro Transit system. As part of the Green Line opening it became part of an extended Route 67. Ridership has risen, but not enough, so weekday rush hour, night and weekend service is being reduced.

Route 84, the half-hourly Snelling Avenue local, will no longer reach Rosedale. It has been cut back to Midway Parkway, just north of Como Avenue. The A Line BRT took almost all the ridership north of there and the redundancy was obvious. This will also eliminate bus overcrowding at the Rosedale Transit Center.

The little rush hour Route 20 was designed to shuttle Northstar Commuter Rail passengers from Target Field Station to the 9th-10th Street area of downtown. Ridership was pretty low, so it’s gone.

Not a surprise, but something of a shock nonetheless is the discontinuance of midday service on St. Clair Avenue in St. Paul. Route 70 west of downtown had been down to an hourly midday schedule for years, but this is still the first time that an all-day urban local route has been made rush hour only since it happened to the Kenwood line decades ago.

Trimming Expresses
The 35W surge included pre-6 AM arrivals on most expresses. The ridership simply didn’t appear, so those were easy cuts.

Express ridership has been trending down for a couple of years, so some trimming has occurred. About 20 rush hour express and limited stop trips have been eliminated.

Less service for Route 21
One of the busiest routes in the system, the 21 Selby-Lake, was one of only two (with Route 18 Nicollet Avenue) to still boast a 7.5-minute midday frequency. 7.5-minute service only happens when demand requires it. Route 5 Chicago-Fremont used to have it, but was dropped to every 10 minutes. That also happened to Route 16 University Avenue a few years before the Green Line debut. Now the 21 is also every 10 minutes on weekdays. Because only half the buses continue to downtown St. Paul, the St. Paul frequency drops from every 15 to every 20 minutes.

This change saves a lot of money. The question is whether a bus every 10 minutes can handle the load. More than most lines, the 21 is subject to bus bunching due to traffic congestion.

Franklin Crosstown stop spacing
For some time there has been a debate in the Streets.mn comment section on bus stop spacing. The Metro Transit standard for a local route is 8 stops per mile. On routes where buses stop every block to handle passengers, this can get pretty slow and laborious. Metro Transit’s answer has been to overlay an arterial BRT that stops every half mile. That way local stops are preserved for anyone with mobility issues, or just not wanting to walk a quarter mile to catch the BRT.

Route 2 Franklin Crosstown is heavily patronized and very slow. No BRT has been proposed for this corridor, but something needed to be done to speed things up, so Metro Transit has widened the stop spacing to 4 per mile. So far the scheduled end to end running time has not been changed, because on-time performance wasn’t great with the old stop spacing.

Traffic signal priority for buses is proposed for the future. It will be interesting to see if the schedule can be tightened, if on-time performance improves, and if there is any customer backlash because of the missing stops.

Northstar on-time performance
Metro Transit staff recently gave a report to the Met Council that shows the strong correlation between Northstar commuter rail on-time performance and ridership. Although the scales of the two charts are slightly different, they show how ridership grew, then dipped during 2014 when BNSF’s congestion issues messed up the commuter trains.

Note that since 2015, with one minor exception, on-time performance has been higher than ever. That said, it took riders a couple of years to trust the service again. Then along came a smaller on-time dip and ridership tailed off slightly.

Northstar On Time Performance

Northstar Average Weekly Ridership

 

 

 

 

 

Streets.mn is a non-profit and is volunteer run. We rely on your support to keep the servers running. If you value what you read, please consider becoming a member.

18 Responses to The Quarterly Transit Report — November 2018

  1. Joey Senkyr
    Joey Senkyr November 19, 2018 at 10:16 am #

    Thanks for putting this together, Aaron.

    Do you have any insight onto why articulated buses don’t seem to be used much on overcrowded local routes? I see them used for commuter express routes, and occasionally on the 3, but unless I’m just missing them, I don’t recall ever seeing them used on routes like the 5, 6, or 21, which, at least during rush hour, could greatly benefit.

    • Adam Miller
      Adam Miller November 19, 2018 at 11:31 am #

      I was sharing bike lane space on Chicago with an articulate 5 just the other day.

    • Joe November 19, 2018 at 11:56 am #

      The 5 uses articulated buses. I’ve ridden on them.

    • Brandon November 19, 2018 at 3:20 pm #

      Articulated buses on the 5 route but only on Saturdays. Not sure if this is due to higher ridership on that day or if there is some other reason.

      • Joe K November 20, 2018 at 7:47 pm #

        Pretty sure the 5 runs those artics because of the reduced frequency, but still pretty high ridership on weekends-and because express service isn’t running, there are a lotmore artics available than during the week.

  2. Alex Schieferdecker
    Alex Schieferdecker November 19, 2018 at 10:36 am #

    It should be noted at aBRT *should* be proposed for Franklin, and hopefully Metro Transit basically just keeps adding features to the #2 until it becomes aBRT by default and Metro Transit buys it some new vehicles to make it official.

  3. keith reedon November 19, 2018 at 9:20 pm #

    These poor performing routes such as #70 can cut back to hourly on Burns Ave ,St Clair #70 will be trimmed to peak only.

    7C/#27/39/111/134 /415/417/350 all have many alternatives.
    7C on Ply Ave is redundant with several routes crosses PLY Ave #5/19/22 .This route was improved after weekends services were cut then reinstated as a shuttle,it is such a waste of valuable resources .Most riders have less than 1/4 mile with several buslines.
    There are too many routes competing on Rice St,#3AB/62/67/68/61 .Rice is only 4 blocks from Jackson
    Highland #23/46/63/74/70/84/A? all connects to Blue/Green line with 10mins headways
    SE mpls used to have only #4/6/25 ,#2 /3/61 were added buses are piling on top of each other

  4. ann k November 19, 2018 at 9:27 pm #

    The #21A should become a limited stops to Midway every15minutes using artic buses daily .Lake/Marshall portion get faster services similar to #54.
    keep 21ECD every20- 30mins for local services shorter span the blocks are short to riders will walk to the major stops.
    Route#21A travel time is over 70mins which need to be reduce.
    The Chi-Lake TC need to close this increase operating cost and add significant travel time to the schedules .
    Reduction in headway will create overcrowding and bunching.

  5. lance November 19, 2018 at 9:38 pm #

    Some low ridership routes should be contracted which will reduce number of drivers and operating cost and prevent further cuts.
    Some routes to consider are :
    Route 46 weekends which is have several trips cut
    #65 Dale was reduced .
    #84 will be shorten.

    #71Concord,75 Stryker (MVTA can operate these routes in Dakota County).
    Route 452 riders can easily use the underused #62 and 75 transfer to Rt 94 express which is every10-15mins vs 4 trips on #452.
    Why is # 415 operating when Brown College closed and MVTA #446 available?

    • Sean Hayford Oleary
      Sean Hayford Oleary November 20, 2018 at 2:29 pm #

      Quasi-moderator hat here: this comment and the three above all appear to be written by the same author, from the same location. However, they all appear to be legitimate feedback on the transit system, so we are not removing anything.

      However, a reminder to all to please use your real name (just one) and email.

  6. Joseph Totten
    Joseph Totten November 19, 2018 at 10:47 pm #

    Isaac, could you help me figure out one part of the driver shortage?

    I listened to The Urbanist yesterday and they were discussing London buses, and they had an architect (I think) on who also drove bus one day a week. When I looked at driving for TriMet or Metro Transit to have a decent part time gig while in school it seemed I had to drive 25+ hours a week with little starting control over my hours (couldn’t work around classes well).

    A few questions based on this 1 – Are those basic requirements of new drivers true? 2 – Could MetroTransit add people on a truly part time basis to drive morning or evening rush twice a week only? Why or why not? 3 – Would it ever be worth it? Why or why not?

    • Aaron Isaacs
      Aaron Isaacs November 20, 2018 at 6:20 pm #

      I think the main reason it doesn’t happen is the high cost of training a new driver. It takes about 6-8 weeks. Hard to justify for so few hours and probably high turnover.

      Also, in the past most new drivers wanted to move up to full time work, not fewer hours.

      • Joseph Totten
        Joseph Totten November 22, 2018 at 12:03 pm #

        The first point is entirely valid, but the second point is a natural continuation of having so many hours that this cannot be an extra job, and having less flexibility than other part time jobs.

        (Granted, a lot of part time work has high turnover. Would like to see something targeted to students or other true part timers, even for a pilot).

  7. Jeb Rach
    Jeb Rach November 20, 2018 at 9:34 am #

    The Roselawn stop removal on the 84 is a bit concerning, but looking at ridership statistics it looks like only a couple people (3 on/off in each direction) use it each day. I’m still frustrated seeing a stop close entirely like that without great alternatives (the nearest stops are all about a half mile away) but I wouldn’t be surprised if the ridership figures are better stopping at Lyngblomsten Care Center and cutting off Rosedale.

  8. rita November 21, 2018 at 11:32 am #

    There are more commuter routes than local with excessive deadheading .Some areas they need to trim where there are corresponding local routes/trains such as in Highland the UM commuter routes .The park/ride lots/garages are not free this cost are not factor into the operating cost of the routes they served.

  9. ashton November 23, 2018 at 12:38 pm #

    Several buses are not showing up due to driver’s shortage .the impact is severe when the transit dependent riders are the ones without alternate routes riders are forced to wait another 30-60 mins or use UBER .Jst Wed the 74 A did not show ,last week the 63 did not show up .why the target the local urban routes to drop trips
    It will be beneficial to , eliminate routes where riders can use alternate routes which will reduce the numbers esp rush hours .

Note on Comments

streets.mn welcomes opinions from many perspectives. Please refrain from attacking or disparaging others in your comments. streets.mn sees debate as a learning opportunity. Please share your perspective in a respectful manner. View our full comment policy to learn more.

Thanks for commenting on streets.mn!